Ghost Kitchens
Ghost kitchen, dark kitchen, cloud kitchen: what the labels actually mean on the floor
The three terms get used interchangeably online. On the operating floor they describe different setups, with different cost bases and different licence models. Here is the practical distinction.
23 March 2026One Kcn editorial6 min read

The vocabulary is messy. Ghost kitchen, dark kitchen, cloud kitchen, virtual restaurant, delivery kitchen. Trade press uses them interchangeably. Operators do not.
The labels matter when you sign a contract. They affect what you pay, what you control, and how easily you can leave.
This is the working distinction we use at our Fulham hub, where seven kitchen units operate under a single roof with seven separate operators in them.
Dark kitchen: the original meaning
A dark kitchen is a kitchen with no front of house. No customers walk in. Food leaves through the back door, on a delivery rider, headed for someone's flat.
The label originated around 2015, when established restaurant brands began running delivery-only sites to extend their catchment without paying restaurant rents. Pizza Hut and Wagamama both ran early dark sites in London. The kitchen was theirs, the brand was theirs, the only thing they removed was the dining room.
The term is morally neutral but the word "dark" reads industrial, which is why marketing copy started moving away from it around 2019.
Ghost kitchen: the operator model
A ghost kitchen is a private kitchen unit, rented to a single operator, used to run one or several delivery brands. The defining feature is that the operator owns the brand and the customer relationship. The landlord just provides the room, the gas, the canopy, and the locks.
Most independent UK delivery operators work this way. They lease a unit, fit a single concept (or two, or five), and trade through Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat under brand names that exist only on the apps.
“A ghost kitchen is a room with a gas line and a door. Everything that makes it a business comes from the operator inside it.”
Cloud kitchen: the aggregator model
A cloud kitchen is the version that gets venture funding. A single operator builds a large warehouse split into dozens of small bays, then sub-licences the bays to delivery brands on rolling monthly terms. The operator owns the property, the equipment, sometimes the order management software, and takes a percentage of revenue on top of rent.
Deliveroo Editions was the most visible UK example. They closed most of their UK sites in 2022 after the unit economics failed to scale (Reuters, 2022). Foodstars, Karma, and Kitch run different versions of the cloud-kitchen model that are still trading.
The trade-off for an operator is straightforward. Cloud kitchens charge more per square foot than independent ghost kitchens, in exchange for shorter notice periods and less paperwork up front. They are also more crowded. Eight brands sharing one extraction system means the busy night affects everyone.
Why operators care which one they are in
Three reasons.
First, the cost base. Revenue-share contracts cap the upside on a successful brand. A ghost-kitchen operator running a strong concept keeps the margin. A cloud-kitchen operator running the same concept hands a slice back to the landlord every week.
Second, the contract length. Cloud kitchens pitch flexibility, but the flip side is that the landlord can also push you out. Independent ghost kitchens typically run on 12-month or 24-month terms with break clauses, which suits operators who are scaling slowly and want a known cost line.
Third, control over the room. In a ghost kitchen the unit is yours. You decide what kit goes in, when staff arrive, what hygiene practices are followed. In a cloud kitchen you share extraction, sometimes share storage, and accept the operator's standard fit-out.
Picking the right model for your stage
For a brand testing one menu, a cloud-kitchen bay is cheap insurance. You can leave on 30 days notice. The risk on month one is small.
For an established operator running two or three brands with consistent weekly orders, a ghost kitchen is almost always cheaper per cover, and the longer commitment buys better margins.
For a multi-site brand looking at central production for retail or wholesale, neither label fits cleanly, and the contract is usually a bespoke industrial lease.
What about virtual restaurants and dark stores?
Two more terms you will hear, neither of which describes a kitchen.
A virtual restaurant is a brand that exists only on the delivery apps. It has no physical premises customers can visit. The kitchen behind the brand can be a ghost kitchen, a cloud kitchen, an existing restaurant operating a side menu, or a chain unit running a third-party concept under licence. Virtual restaurant describes a brand strategy, not a building.
A dark store is a different industry entirely. It is the rapid-grocery model that companies like Getir and Gorillas tried to scale in 2021 and 2022. Most have closed. The "dark" prefix is shared with dark kitchen but the businesses do not overlap.
Operators who learn the language clearly pay less in rent and sign cleaner contracts. Operators who do not are more likely to discover at month four that the 8 percent line in their agreement was actually 8 percent of gross revenue, not 8 percent of net.
See our Fulham ghost kitchen units
Seven self-contained units in SW6, gas and electric. Twelve-month terms, no revenue share.
Read more →Written by
One Kcn editorial
One Kcn editorial team